Politicalpedia
World

From Power Tariffs to Political Revolt: Why PoK is on the Boil

Why are there protests in PoK? | Explained

By Rohan GuptaPublished 14 June 2026· 2 min read
From Power Tariffs to Political Revolt: Why PoK is on the Boil
From Power Tariffs to Political Revolt: Why PoK is on the Boil

Civilian unrest in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir has intensified as the Joint Awami Action Committee leads a fierce movement against economic neglect and political disenfranchisement.

The streets of Muzaffarabad and surrounding districts have transformed into a theatre of defiance. What began in 2023 as a local outcry over skyrocketing electricity tariffs and the crushing weight of inflation has mutated into a systemic challenge against Islamabad’s authority. At the heart of this storm is the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), an umbrella group representing a cross-section of traders, students, and civil society members who are no longer willing to accept the status quo.

The Roots of the Unrest

The grievances are as much about economics as they are about dignity. The JAAC’s 38-point charter is a roadmap of regional frustration. Residents are demanding subsidised wheat flour and electricity pricing that reflects the reality of the local Mangla dam—a massive hydropower source that generates power for Pakistan while the local population grapples with exorbitant bills. When promised tariff relief failed to materialise, the protests moved from negotiation tables to the streets.

The situation spiralled in May 2024 when a planned march to the regional capital prompted a state crackdown, leading to dozens of arrests and subsequent clashes that left at least four dead. Despite a reactive PKR 10 billion grant for the power grid and promises of better health cards following further violence in October 2025, the core political tension remains unresolved.

The 12 Seats Controversy

Tensions are currently exacerbated by the upcoming July 27 elections. A flashpoint for the JAAC is the reservation of 12 seats in the legislative assembly for refugees, a policy the group views as an instrument of political engineering. By announcing a protest march on the very day nomination filings were set to begin, the movement effectively signaled that its ambitions go beyond mere utility bills. The state’s response—labeling the JAAC a terrorist-linked entity and initiating a brutal crackdown—has only widened the trust deficit. With death tolls mounting into the dozens following violent confrontations between forces and civilians, the region is witnessing its most precarious moment in decades.

Why it matters: A systemic unraveling

This movement is not merely a localized agitation; it represents a fundamental breakdown in the social contract between the region and the central administration in Pakistan. The pattern of offering short-term financial sops—like the $86.25 million subsidy package—has proven ineffective against the structural demand for equitable representation.

For observers, these protests are a diagnostic tool for Pakistan’s broader struggle with governance and fiscal stability. As the movement spreads across the region, it highlights the inherent volatility of a system that relies on administrative control rather than addressing the socio-economic aspirations of its populace. Whether this escalation remains a regional crisis or triggers a more significant political realignment depends on how Islamabad addresses the "12 seats" question, a demand that cuts to the very core of the region's political identity.

By Rohan Gupta
Business Correspondent

Rohan Gupta covers the economy, markets and companies for PoliticalPedia.