The Return of Sudan Gurung: Why Balen’s ‘Bestie’ is Back at the Helm in Nepal
Sudan Gurung is back in Balen's Nepal govt as home minister: Who is he and why the U-turn | Explained

Clearing a probe into financial misconduct, the controversial minister returns to the Home Ministry, testing the stability of the Balen Shah government.
The revolving door at Nepal’s Home Ministry has come to a screeching halt—for now. Sudan Gurung, the firebrand face of Nepal’s Gen-Z protest movement, has officially been reinstated as Home Minister. The move comes just weeks after he stepped down in a calculated bid to weather a storm of accusations regarding his financial disclosures. With a government-mandated committee now clearing him of wrongdoing, Prime Minister Balendra Shah—better known as Balen—has gambled on bringing his political protege back into the fold.
From Protest Streets to Power
Sudan Gurung’s rise is as meteoric as it is polarizing. He caught the national imagination during the youth-led protests of last September, a movement that shifted the tectonic plates of Nepali politics. Riding that wave of anti-establishment fervor, he secured a parliamentary seat from Gorkha in the March 5 elections. For Balen, Gurung wasn’t just a cabinet pick; he was a symbol of the "new-age" politics the Prime Minister promised. Upon taking office, Gurung wasted no time, building a reputation as a tough-on-crime administrator by ordering the arrests of several high-ranking officials.
The Resignation and the ‘Murky’ Probe
Despite his popularity, the honeymoon period was short-lived. By April 22, the pressure became untenable. Reports began swirling around Gurung’s alleged links to controversial businessman Deepak Bhatt, who is currently under the scanner in an ongoing money laundering investigation. The controversy centered on Gurung’s shareholding in entities like Star Micro Insurance and Liberty Micro Insurance. Critics questioned why these investments weren’t fully disclosed, fueling accusations of a conflict of interest that threatened to derail the new administration. Gurung’s resignation was framed as a moral high ground—a way to allow a "fair investigation"—but for many in the opposition, it was an admission of a systemic rot within the government’s inner circle.
Why it Matters: The Bigger Picture
This reinstatement is a litmus test for Balen’s government. By backing Gurung, the Prime Minister is signaling that he prioritizes loyalist reformers over the optics of a scandal. However, the move carries significant risks. In the volatile landscape of Nepal’s parliament, where alliances are fragile and every move is dissected, bringing back a minister previously tainted by "murky" financial allegations provides ample ammunition for his critics. The government’s challenge now is to prove that the investigation was truly independent and not just a procedural formality designed to facilitate a return to power. If Gurung stumbles again, the fallout may hit the Prime Minister’s own credibility, which has already been tested by a series of ongoing reforms and mounting controversies.
What Lies Ahead
For now, the focus shifts to whether Gurung can regain his momentum without becoming a permanent liability. With the opposition watching for any sign of impropriety, his second innings will likely be under a microscope. While he has been cleared by the committee, public perception remains divided. For an administration that campaigned on transparency and sweeping change, the Gurung saga serves as a reminder that the path from agitator to administrator is fraught with compromises that are rarely easy to explain to the electorate.
Priya Nair covers parties, elections and the business of power for PoliticalPedia.