NTA Orders Re-test for UGC NET June Candidates After Jalandhar Glitch

Affected students who faced technical disruptions during the June 22 examination are set for a fresh attempt at the designated Jalandhar centre.

For hundreds of aspirants, the high-stakes UGC NET June 2026 exam turned into a source of unexpected anxiety this weekend. The National Testing Agency (NTA) has officially confirmed that a re-examination will be held for a specific group of candidates following technical malfunctions reported during the first shift on June 22.

The trouble originated at the CT Group of Institutions examination centre in Jalandhar. According to the official communication, the service provider, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), flagged technical issues that prevented the smooth conduct of the test for those present. While the vast majority of the country completed their papers without incident, the NTA’s decision to mandate a re-exam serves as a critical course correction to ensure fairness for those caught in the digital breakdown.

Ensuring Exam Integrity

The NTA has been under intense pressure to maintain the sanctity of national-level testing. The decision to isolate the re-exam to a single centre—rather than a broader, disruptive cancellation—suggests an attempt to balance administrative efficiency with the rights of the students. Candidates affected by the Jalandhar centre glitch are advised to keep a close watch on the official portal for their revised admit card details.

Despite the focus on this specific incident, the broader examination calendar remains packed. With various board results, including Class 10 and 12 scorecards, surfacing across the country, and competitive tests like the CTET and NEET undergoing their own logistical adjustments, the education sector is currently navigating a period of high volatility.

The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters

Technical glitches in massive, digitised examinations are more than just minor inconveniences; they represent a recurring challenge for agencies like the NTA. When a centre’s infrastructure fails, it doesn't just disrupt a morning—it risks skewing the percentile results for thousands of aspirants.

While individual re-exams are the necessary solution, they highlight an underlying fragility in the scaling of national testing. As the frequency of these high-stakes exams increases, the margin for error narrows. For the student, a smooth exam interface isn't a luxury—it is the baseline expectation for a fair shot at a career in academia or research. Moving forward, the industry will likely see increased scrutiny on the hardware and server stability of third-party testing partners to prevent such recurring technical hurdles.