Politicalpedia
States

Beyond the Classroom: The Ugly Power Struggle Unfolding in Patna’s Coaching Hub

'खान सर और किसान कोल्ड स्टोरेज के मालिक ने कराई प्रिंस की हत्या', जेल से निकलते ही रौशन आनंद का बड़ा दावा

By Ananya IyerPublished 15 June 2026· 3 min read
Beyond the Classroom: The Ugly Power Struggle Unfolding in Patna’s Coaching Hub
Beyond the Classroom: The Ugly Power Struggle Unfolding in Patna’s Coaching Hub

As Raushan Anand walks out of Beur Jail, he levels explosive allegations against rival Khan Sir, dragging a cold storage owner into a murky narrative of conspiracy and death.

The competitive coaching landscape of Patna’s Musallahpur is no longer defined by success rates or entrance exam results. It has transformed into a high-stakes battleground of influence, legal battles, and now, chilling allegations of homicide. Raushan Anand, the director of Gyan Bindu Coaching Centre, stepped out of Beur Jail this week following a bail order, but he returned to the public eye with a narrative far removed from academic merit.

The primary source of this latest friction is a direct accusation from Anand, who claims that his brother, Prince Yadav, was not a victim of natural causes, but of a calculated conspiracy. Anand has explicitly named two individuals as the architects of this alleged plot: the famous educator Khan Sir (Faizal Khan) and RS Prasad, the owner of Kisan Cold Storage. According to Anand, the timing of his brother’s death—which occurred while Anand was incarcerated following a firing and assault case involving the two rival coaching giants—is far from coincidental.

A Narrative of Contradictions

While Anand paints a picture of a targeted hit, the counter-narrative is equally complex. Multiple outlets have circulated footage where a close associate of the deceased offers a drastically different account. In this viral video, the friend insists that Prince Yadav had been battling mental health struggles and had been off his prescribed medication. He claims that the group had gathered for a casual visit, and despite a brief period where Prince appeared unwell and required hospitalisation, the suggestion of foul play is categorically denied by those who were present.

The original article details highlight how this situation has spiraled into a public war of words. Anand remains steadfast in his claim that his imprisonment provided the window of opportunity for his rivals to eliminate his family member. He accuses Khan Sir of orchestrating a campaign of falsehoods to keep him sidelined, claiming he was framed while his rival remained free.

Why it Matters: The Coaching Mafia Phenomenon

This feud underscores a troubling trend in India’s hyper-competitive education hubs. When coaching empires grow to possess the financial and social capital of corporate entities, the friction between them often spills out of the classroom and into the streets. What we are seeing in Patna is the "corporatization" of local rivalry, where legal disputes, police cases, and public accusations become tools of market competition.

The involvement of local business figures like the owner of Kisan Cold Storage suggests that these coaching centers are deeply entrenched in local power dynamics that go well beyond the interests of the student body. As law enforcement continues to investigate the specific charges, the broader implication is clear: the sanctity of the teaching profession is being eroded by a toxic culture of intimidation. If these allegations of conspiracies are proven true, it would represent a dangerous shift in how educational power is wielded in Bihar. For now, the public is left to parse between two vastly different versions of a tragedy, while the city's academic reputation takes yet another hit.

By Ananya Iyer
World Affairs Correspondent

Ananya Iyer covers global affairs with an Indian lens for PoliticalPedia.