Politicalpedia
Education & Jobs

A Fig Leaf on History: The Controversy Behind the NCERT’s Altered ‘Dancing Girl’

NCERT Class 9 book clothes 'Dancing Girl' to make it 'age-appropriate', raises questions

By Arjun MehtaPublished 15 June 2026· 2 min read
A Fig Leaf on History: The Controversy Behind the NCERT’s Altered ‘Dancing Girl’
A Fig Leaf on History: The Controversy Behind the NCERT’s Altered ‘Dancing Girl’

The iconic bronze figurine from Mohenjo-daro has been digitally modified in a new arts textbook, sparking a debate over historical accuracy and the politics of education.

For nearly a century, the “Dancing Girl” of Mohenjo-daro has stood as the definitive symbol of the Indus Valley Civilization—a masterpiece of bronze casting that reveals the sophisticated aesthetics of a bygone era. Now, that historical integrity is being questioned. In the new Class 9 arts education textbook, Madhurima, the NCERT has published an image of the figurine with its bare torso obscured by digital shading, essentially “clothing” the ancient artefact.

The modification has drawn sharp criticism from educators and historians who argue that altering a globally recognised archaeological find is a disservice to students. While the Dancing Girl appears in a form true to the original in the NCERT’s own Class 6 social science textbook, the decision to censor the image in the higher-level Madhurima text suggests a shift in how the council approaches the depiction of the human form in school materials.

The ‘Age-Appropriate’ Debate

The impulse to alter the statue stems from concerns over "age-appropriateness," a rationale that has left many in the academic community baffled. Michel Danino, who led the textbook development committee for the Class 6 social science books, revealed that his team had previously faced pressure regarding the same image. Despite being told the figurine was not suitable for younger eyes, Danino and his colleagues stood their ground after consulting with teachers, who confirmed that students had never expressed discomfort with the historical artefact.

For Danino, the decision to digitally manipulate the sculpture is a step backward. He likens the addition of shading to the historical practice of adding fig leaves to classical statues during the Middle Ages, arguing that it misrepresents the original intent and artistry of the Harappan craftsmen. “If the Dancing Girl cannot figure as she is, and with proper dimensions, in a chapter on Indian art, then we have a serious problem,” he said.

The Bigger Picture

The controversy highlights a deepening tension between the desire to “decolonise” Indian education and the practical application of that ideal. When the state prioritises an opaque definition of "appropriateness" over the raw, authentic record of human history, it risks sanitising the past to fit contemporary anxieties.

The fact that the same figure remains unaltered in a junior-level book while being modified for older students creates a pedagogical inconsistency that is hard to justify. If the goal of a history or arts textbook is to foster critical thinking and an appreciation for the ancient world, then presenting doctored imagery undermines the very foundation of historical inquiry. By choosing to mask the torso rather than contextualise it, the NCERT inadvertently frames nudity—even in a 4,500-year-old bronze sculpture—as something that requires state intervention.

By Arjun Mehta
National Affairs Correspondent

Arjun Mehta reports on government, policy and Parliament for PoliticalPedia, in English and Hindi.